annluggen

Updated Nov 24

Ring pink sapphire & small diamonds, 7

$110

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $27.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Sterling silver setting with nice pink sapphire stone. Rarely wear anymore. No scratches. As new. 7

Category

Women

Jewelry

Rings

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 3+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 12%
$8.27 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

wtfyougoton and 34 others like this

17 Comments

barbiegirl1213 Interest in dress hun?

Sep 08Reply

annluggen @lingerielust nice but not gold. Will look

Sep 24Reply

lovepink72 @annluggen u have my favorite !!! I love the pink 💗💗💗💗

Oct 19Reply

pixelfairy16 Genuine sapphire? Wow, Ann, just knocked over by you things!!!

Jan 20Reply

sensitive Have?

Jul 01Reply

pongocody Genuine authentic sapphire?

Sep 17Reply

annluggen @pongocody cute name! Yes, which is why it costs so much since not in gold setting.

Sep 17Reply

annluggen @kittish35 thank you for sharing my closet 💕💕💕❣️🌟

Nov 14Reply

kittish35 @annluggen you're welcome! 😊 💟 🎀

Nov 14Reply

laurieloue Love this!

Jan 01Reply

annluggen @laurieloue pretty pink, nice size stone,

Jan 01Reply

aprilmarierox So pretty! What are the side stones? Is it genuine or manmade sapphire ?

Feb 10Reply

annluggen @aprilmarierox they are all real. Reason why it cost so much. If set in gold, would have been 300$.

Feb 10Reply

aprilmarierox @annluggen nice. Very pretty!

Feb 10Reply

aprilmarierox Hello. Soooo I am interested, but what does 925 FAS? Mean?

Feb 15Reply

annluggen @aprilmarierox 925 is sterling, fas is designer or maker🤗

Feb 15Reply

janus660 I have a ring that looks exactly like this one & I took it somewhere to get a uncertified appraisal & it turns out it was just a man made stone with cubic zirconia & mine was stamped 925 also. The person told me that a “real” stone like this would be rare. How do you know it is real? I really think if it were real it would be worth much more & wouldn’t be set in sterling silver.

Nov 02Reply