Lorna Jane booty support leggings

Name: Lorna Jane booty support leggings
Brand: Lorna Jane
SKU: 5ecef9dc074d2415cc06029b
Price: 60.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Lorna Jane

$60 $120

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $15 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

Size small. Super cute just doesn't quite fit right on me. Bought off another seller. High-end like Lululemon. I did way too much research on leggings and these are supposed to make your butt look amazing. Mesh panelling in booty for extra support. Great for high intensity workouts, high waisted. Basically brand new, worn once

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

raerae2007 and 2 others like this

6 Comments

kimgam656 What length?

May 31Reply

trashpandaa @kimgam656 not sure if I'm doing this right but from the top of the high waisted part to the bottom they are 33 inches. they are full length leggings if that helps

Jun 01Reply

bossfit hey! im the same way with legging research. I'd I may ask, what is your favorite brand/ style and your height? I'm short and also incredibly picky with my leggings. lol!!!

Jun 02Reply

trashpandaa @bossfit haha, totally it's a never ending process. I'd been hearing that a lot of the 7/8 sized leggings work for people on the shorter side. I love the gymshark seamless energy leggings for the cutout detail work and shading that they have, but they also tend to run long.

Jun 02Reply

trashpandaa @bossfit oof, looks like they have a character cap on this...I wrote you out a long response but it got capped at 500 characters for me. the leggings I have listed stop perfectly on me, but I'm also 5'6. pluses with these are that they have the mesh panelling in the butt, are super squat proof, and have good compression while still being comfortable

Jun 02Reply

trashpandaa @bossfit if it were me I'd look into some 7/8 leggings, I think they run around 23 inches. Lululemon has a bunch, you'd just have to figure out what fabric you want and what style

Jun 02Reply