LV Vintage monogram denim jeans

Name: LV Vintage monogram denim jeans
Brand: Louis Vuitton
SKU: 689a7e239936d6e1d0bb9a0b
Price: 3500.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Louis Vuitton

$3,500 $9,999

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

LV Vintage monogram denim jeans. Size 38. Purchased these from vintage shop: treasures of NYC in 2020 and they were fully authenticated. 100% authentic and will be authenticated by Poshmark when shipped (automatically done for all sales over $500). These are vintage 90s / Y2K era Louis Vuitton. Size 38. I’ve worn these a handful of times and they’re absolutely stunning but I don’t wear them enough. No lowballs! These are super rare beautiful investment vintage piece that are in excellent condition. I’d rather keep these as an investment piece that I wear rarely than sell for less than they’re worth.

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
$6.49 Shipping
FREE authentication on items over $500!

khungift and 105 others like this

8 Comments

kimleroux620 what US size

Oct 08Reply

cls0817 @kimleroux620 I would say this fits like a 2/4 US. if you’d like measurements of them laid flat I can do that!

Oct 08Reply

kimleroux620 sorry 2 or 4 won't work

Oct 08Reply

cls0817 @kimleroux620 no worries! On LV website it says 38 is about a US 6 however, these are vintage and definitely run smaller having worn them myself. Thank you for your interest anyway! 🥰

Oct 08Reply

claudiaskinner $3,500 I buy with warranty, and new at the LV store for less.

Oct 21Reply

cls0817 @claudiaskinner incorrect. These are vintage from the late 90s and are not sold at LV anymore. These are much more rare. There are monogram jeans sold at LV now are beautiful in their own right but are much different than these, they are not the same cut, style, denim etc. all of that is completely different now. This vintage style has more value than the ones that are more mass produced and sold today. Thanks for your comment though - gives me an opportunity to give more detail!

Oct 21Reply