Dolce & Gabanna vintage jeans

Name: Dolce & Gabanna vintage jeans
Brand: Dolce & Gabbana
SKU: 5cb2948bffc2d41f49061a3b
Price: 50.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Dolce & Gabbana

$50 $199

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $12.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Cool vintage jeans by Dolce & Gabanna, size 28. Gray, faded consistent with age. Rhinestone detail on both sides of the front, and an arc of rhinestones (and a seam) over buttock area. Button fly, slightly-flared style legs. Belt loops fit a wide size belt fashionable in that decade (maybe 70s or 80s?). NOTE: jeans missing some rhinestones, as well as a metal emblem from the back leather patch. Still, they are in great shape for their age. 14" across waist, 7" rise, 28" inseam. Cotton/poly.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 14%
$6.49 Shipping

sofiapuchniak and 33 others like this

8 Comments

peggygodson @originalgypsy Thanks for the like! Let me know if I can answer any questions 😁

Apr 14Reply

peggygodson @ktgroce Thanks for the like! Let me know if I can answer any questions you may have 😁

Apr 27Reply

peggygodson @nhans1 Thanks for the like! Let me know if I can answer any questions. 😊

Sep 01Reply

peggygodson @urthcreature Thanks for the like! Let me know if I can answer any questions 😊

Sep 06Reply

peggygodson @stephaniejoh358 Thanks for the like! Let me know if I can answer any questions. I'm happy to entertain reasonable offers. 😁

Sep 24Reply

mollyhohl7 What’s the hip measurement?

Jan 11Reply

peggygodson @mollyhohl7 Thanks for asking. They are about 17.5" across at the widest place. There is one tiny spot where the fabric has faded that I will take a photo of; thought I did when I posted them. Someone could probably touch it lightly with a permanent marker it it bothered. Hopes this helps! Take care.😊

Jan 12Reply

peggygodson @mollyhohl7 Measured a 2nd time, and more like 17". The curve makes it a little difficult to be exact, and they have a little stretch.

Jan 12Reply