Authentic Vintage 60s Pucci Sunglasses

Name: Authentic Vintage 60s Pucci Sunglasses
Brand: Emilio Pucci
SKU: 5b86efd2c6177726b4bf2138
Price: 325.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Emilio Pucci

$325 $700

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $81.25 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

Rare 60s BIG Bold vintage Pucci sunglasses in very good condition! Lots of fun! Lenses in excellent condition. No trades please. Please submit offers through button and not in comments.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
$6.49 Shipping

punklaglamorez and 94 others like this

14 Comments

bam___ 🔥🔥🤩

Aug 31Reply

abrazosybesos Gorgeous girl!!!

Sep 12Reply

pursenalfinds These are Heaven sent! 💖

Sep 25Reply

goldengirlash Do they come with case?

Dec 16Reply

mlaf @goldengirlash No :( They didn’t come with them when I bought them sorry!

Dec 16Reply

bamfshades dang....

Jan 06Reply

samsteve143 Any interest in trading

Feb 11Reply

deirdrereinert These are to die for.! Since they are vintage (60s era?)) I am concerned they might be a little, well, rickety, or loose at the joints. Are they confidently wearable? Not trying to be difficult, but I bought an expensive 70s pair last year that the seller said were in excellent condition &then the joints were loose enough that they slid off my head if I looked down (& I have a big head). If I am going to spend this much on a pair of sunglasses I need them to be functional. Any info on that pls?

Feb 16Reply

mlaf @deirdrereinert I would definitely say they are confidently wearable. I bought them from the original owner of them and they are really great condition. I wouldn’t say the arms are the stiffest, but they don’t fall off my face or feel rickety at all. I love them but selling because I have several pair and recently bought a Chloe bag I need to offset 😊 Let me know if you have any other questions!

Feb 16Reply

deirdrereinert @mlaf thanks so much for the info! Going to see how much money ai have left at the end of the month...

Feb 17Reply