Anthropologie Floreat Fire's Path Dress 0

Name: Anthropologie Floreat Fire's Path Dress 0
Brand: Anthropologie
SKU: 55b7ad6acadd6a528c018105
Price: 90.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Anthropologie

$90 $200

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $22.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Floreat follows the glow of incendiary paprika poplin toward an embroidered aviary, bordered by a silk habotai hem. This dress is size 0 and is in excellent pre-owned condition. The actual dress measures: 16" from pit to pit, 34" from shoulder to hem. Dry clean. I love this dress so much, but it just doesn't work for my body type. I am 5'2" slender and it looks like a sack. I think it is better for someone a bit taller. Comes from a smoke free home. Please check out my other listings.

Category

Women

Dresses

Color

Red

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

helkinton and 23 others like this

7 Comments

nikomagirl Anyone interested in this dress, please make a reasonable offer. It's too beautiful to be hanging in my closet. You need to wear it and turn some heads!

Aug 23Reply

minneloa This is gorgeous!

Apr 15Reply

nikomagirl @minneloa Oh my gosh, I know. It fits me like a sack though. It I were taller it might be better.

Apr 16Reply

jlho Hi, it's hard to know about the sizing of this. I am usually a 4 in Floreat, but this looks baggier. Are the arm holes true to size? Thanks

Sep 03Reply

nikomagirl @jlho Its definitely a baggier fit, more like a sack than a bag. I can measure the arm openings in a few days. I don’t feel like the arms are big at all though. I usually wear anything from 0 to 4 depending on the dress. These armholes are good.

Sep 04Reply

nikomagirl @jlho a friend of mine tried it to borrow and she’s a traditional 4 and it fit, but it was short and a little tight.

Sep 04Reply

jlho @nikomagirl Thanks. I am wondering if I should go size 2, in between. I will do some research on other sizes and see what people said. Thanks again!

Sep 04Reply