SOLD💥 GIVENCHY Eel Shark Lock Boots 38

Name: SOLD💥 GIVENCHY Eel Shark Lock Boots 38
Brand: Givenchy
SKU: 5cb9459616105daf72f44ab0
Price: 850.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Givenchy

$850 $2,200

AUTHENTICATION INCLUDED

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $212.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

Gorgeous GIVENCHY Black Eel Skin Shark Lock Boots - Sz 38 Minimal wear to leather, Minimal/Moderate wear to soles/Heels Listed for less elsewhere. Please review all photos and feel free to ask any questions xx

Category

Women

Shoes

Ankle Boots & Booties

Color

Black

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 15% off 2+ Bundle
$6.49 Shipping
FREE authentication on items over $500!

ashread84 and 59 others like this

8 Comments

yoga_central19 Hey thanks for following me how are you! I am looking to meet and connect with new people. Do you have Facebook so we can connect

Jul 04Reply

mcgowanpaige02 box and dust bag included? What grade would you give these (in terms of wear) A,B,C.. etc

Jul 06Reply

bethanyp101 @mcgowanpaige02 Hi! No box but I believe the dustbag is around somewhere. I would give the uppers a 4/5 and the soles 2.5-3/5 - but they could easily be resoled and look good as new and last forever x

Jul 06Reply

mcgowanpaige02 @bethanyp101 Thanks. Thinking about it still. Love these

Jul 07Reply

bethanyp101 @pokerluv85 Hi lovely, I just countered at the lowest I could go - these are $2k+ boots and the uppers are in awesome condition. If you can somehow meet me there, I will package up and send asap. They're seriously gorgeous xx

Jul 29Reply

bethanyp101 @pokerluv85 Oh yes, totally wearable - they've got plenty of life left in them. I would personally choose to have them resoled at some point to keep them in great shape. But yes, 100% wearable as is.

Jul 29Reply

bethanyp101 @pokerluv85 The soles are leather which always seem to look way worse after being worn x

Jul 29Reply

bethanyp101 @coca256 Sounds good - if you buy soon I’ll package up and get them in the mail ASAP xx

Jul 29Reply