swilliams90211

Updated 5 days ago

18K Gold 1.82 CTW Diamond Cluster Stud Earrings

$2,450 $5,000

Free Shipping

Buy now, pay later with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Stunning diamond stud earring set! Subtle, but classic. Just the right size to be worn casually daily or even dressed up for a nicer occasion. Truly sparkles even brighter in person! I purchased this set from a reputable and well known auction house. It has been evaluated and verified by a GIA Graduate Gemologist. Materials: 18K Gold Earring Type: Button Earring Closure Type: Clutch Back Hallmarks: Au 750 Total Weight (grams): 4.10 Primary Stone(s) Type: Diamond Primary Stone(s) Shape: Round Brilliant Cut Primary Stone(s) Dimensions: 1.60 mm – 3.20 mm Total Primary Stone(s) Carat Weight: 1.82 ctw Primary Stone(s) Color Grade: G – H Primary Stone(s) Clarity Grade: SI1 – I1 Primary Stone(s) Gemologist Note: One Diamond tests as Laboratory Grown *Bundle with other items for a discount!

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

~~$8.27~~ FREE Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on orders over $500!
FREE authentication on items over $500!

sritha17 and 24 others like this

17 Comments

bodybling0702 🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻HOST PICK🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻 Congratulations what an amazing item!!!

Aug 15Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 Hi! No, only one diamond within the cluster, on one earring, tested as lab grown. All the other diamonds are not.

Nov 12Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 hi! I’m potentially open to trades. It would just depend on the item. Can you tag me on the listing for the item you’re referring to? Thanks!

Nov 30Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 So it's true that lab created diamonds and natural diamonds are identical in makeup and virtually impossible to detect the difference with just the naked eye. Also, since both lab & natural diamonds are real diamonds, they both will pass diamond testers. However, it's absolutely possible to detect the difference with the proper equipment.

Dec 01Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 Certain specialized labs like GIA & IGI have the necessary equipment to do that. All my jewelry including these earrings have been evaluated by a GIA Graduate Gemologist and was done under GIA standards. That's where the diamond grading info came from. I'm not the first owner of these earrings, but i believe the previous owner likely damaged or chipped the one diamond and simply chose to have it replaced with a lab created diamond instead.

Dec 01Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 Definitely down to take a picture of them on! I'm swamped at work the next couple of days, but will do my best to get that to you ASAP! Definitely still very interested in the necklace!

Dec 01Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 Also, sorry last thing lol, I was looking at the other items on your page and I saw the earrings you are wearing in your profile photo! They are stunning! SO pretty! Any chance you still have those and might be interested in trading those?

Dec 01Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 ahh all good! they look stunning either way! And to answer your other questions! I live in Beverly Hills. I'm originally from Texas. And no triplets for me haha! Those are my nieces and nephews. They are each a few months apart!

Dec 04Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 I thought you said before that you weren't on social media? Anyway, how do we move forward with the trade? How would it work?

Dec 04Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 great! I’m very excited! The necklace is the perfect holiday treat to myself. Happy to send photos of the earrings on! Actually would you mind sending photos of the necklace on as well?

Dec 04Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 haha very cute! Such a sweet dog! But if you don’t mind can you post one on yourself as well? I’d just like to see where it falls / how it sits on the neck.

Dec 04Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 it is more karats than my earrings but ultimately that’s up to you. As I mentioned before, the diamond info was determined under professional evaluation by a graduate gemologist. I would love to move forward if you would. Any chance you have a clearer picture of the clasp as well? Wherever it shows the hallmarks for “14k” and “Macy’s”?

Dec 04Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 Hi Denise! Just a heads up for anyone who thinks they want to trade with this woman, she’s lying about who she says she is. Her name is not Monika Smith. It’s Denise. I did a reverse image search and found out the pictures used on her profile are from a British influencer named Pixie Lott. She gave me her phone number on a post to arrange a trade and I googled it and found that it belonged to this woman named Denise.

Dec 12Reply

swilliams90211 @monikas247 So I waited a couple days until she forgot that she gave it to me and I messaged her and said Hey Denise! And pretended to be an old friend. She confirmed that it was Denise and then sent me photos to “catch up”, all confirming that she’s not named Monika Smith, nor is she the person in the photos. Anyway, I don’t know if she’s trading responsibly, but you don’t lie about your identity unless you have something to hide. 🤔

Dec 12Reply

swilliams90211 @alldayshopper Dude, Denise (aka Monika, aka Tirna) just stop! I will report you to the cops if you don’t leave me alone! It doesn’t matter if you’ve been “stalked” (which we both know is a lie). You cannot use a fake name and someone else’s photos to do business. That is fraud!!! It is illegal! Creating a new page with a new fake name and the same stolen photos, doesn’t make you less of a fraud. Leave me alone!

Jan 13Reply

swilliams90211 @alldayshopper byeeeeee Denise. ✌🏼

Jan 13Reply

swilliams90211 @alldayshopper also btw I knew all along that you were a fraud. It’s why I asked if you still had the earrings in your profile photo. If your story was true and you were and honest person, you’d just have it explained that the person in your photos isn’t you and you only use it to protect your identity. But you didn’t do that. You lied and said that was an old photo of you and you hadn’t had the earrings in a couple of years. I’m reality that wasn’t a photo of you at all!

Jan 13Reply