skylarsden

Updated Nov 07

Stuart Weitzman Pumps

Name: Stuart Weitzman Pumps
Brand: Stuart Weitzman
SKU: 5ba836f2819e90b5b32e281b
Price: 30.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Stuart Weitzman

$30 $295

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $7.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

Pre-Owned Stuart Weitzman Pumps- Classic, Vintage Leather Pumps with 3 inch Heel. Minor Nics on Leather.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

$8.27 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

raquell_johnson and 16 others like this

15 Comments

flyeagles16 How many times did you wear

Sep 24Reply

skylarsden @flyeagles16 Many...As you can tell by the photos.

Sep 24Reply

flyeagles16 Can u send more pics is email ok

Sep 24Reply

skylarsden @flyeagles16 Sure, please provide your email address and note, that all transactions will be through Poshmark. Thanks for inquiring.

Sep 24Reply

flyeagles16 Jaguars1818@gmail

Sep 24Reply

skylarsden @pstyle101 Hello...I added a few more pictures. They look with jeans or skirts and the heel is the perfect height for the office. They are narrow - it’s a classic vintage Weitzman Pump.

Jan 05Reply

starpoint50 I can’t tell by picture... do the tips need be replaced?

Jan 10Reply

starpoint50 Still available?

Jan 30Reply

skylarsden @starpoint50 I apologize just seeing this message. They need a good polishing.

Jan 31Reply

skylarsden @starpoint50 Yes they are.

Jan 31Reply

starpoint50 Sorry one more question what is width?

Feb 04Reply

waltonandrea61 Hi! I wear a stand B width. You mentioned that these are slightly narrow. Are you a B width? Thanks 🙏

Jan 26Reply

waltonandrea61 Are these available? Thanks 😊

Jan 26Reply

skylarsden @waltonandrea61 Hi, I apologize for the delayed response. Yes they’re available however, I’m not sure if the width is “b” or “m” because the size has rubbed off.

Jan 27Reply

skylarsden @waltonandrea61 These are vintage and very narrow. As I’ve matured, so have my feet😂 So if you’re foot is wide, they will be tight, it fits more like an 8.5 than 9.

Jan 27Reply