paigec27

Updated Aug 19

New Gucci Marmont Matelasse Shoulder Crossbody

Name: New Gucci Marmont Matelasse Shoulder Crossbody
Brand: Gucci
SKU: 5d307acb969d1f8a632f89c2
Price: 2599.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Gucci

$2,599 $5,555

Buy now, pay later with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

New Gucci Maont Shoulder or Crossbody bag! I LOVE this bag but want it in a different color. I just noticed there is a small mark on the back side I never noticed before. Other then that perfect condition. Smoke free home. Color is cream/white, gold chain! Includes box, dust bag and tags. That is a shadow on the last picture not stains! Open to offers and trade 😻

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

~~$7.97~~ FREE Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on orders over $500!
FREE authentication on items over $500!

joanne225 and 71 others like this

21 Comments

paigec27 @nurseching12

Jul 18Reply

asantelic Trade for my Chanel?

Jul 18Reply

shylag80 @paigec27 Gorgeous bag babe!

Jul 18Reply

paigec27 @shylag80 thank you 💕

Jul 18Reply

jeanechooo0 Hi girl thanks like my Chanel bag. I’m open to offers and can do 2500 in P.....pl or 2900 here. Let me know if you are interested!

Jul 20Reply

rileympoor Trade for Gucci sneakers, givenchy sneakers, both new, I also have lv and Hermès!!! Lmk💕

Jul 22Reply

paigec27 @rileympoor I will only trade for another bag

Jul 22Reply

leena_a Would you be interested in my Gucci bag in my closet?

Jul 22Reply

paigec27 @leena_a thank you for your offer but no thank you

Jul 23Reply

paigec27 @l2020n of course. I’ll be home Thursday from vacay and can post more pictures! It literally looks brand new. I carried it one and loveddddd it but I don’t like light colors really so id like to purchase a red or black one in the same bag.

Jul 30Reply

paigec27 @l2020n I took some more pics this morning really quick. There’s a shadow on the one not a stain or anything.

Aug 01Reply

paigec27 @l2020n I took the pics in my closet this morning before work and I have a chandelier in there so it wasn’t natural light

Aug 01Reply