Lily Pulitzer King bedspread and shams

Name: Lily Pulitzer King bedspread and shams
Brand: Lilly Pulitzer
SKU: 66c0d4fd0a60d5a456735d1f
Price: 599.0 USD
Availability: InStock

NWT

Lilly Pulitzer

$599 $1,200

Free Shipping

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $149.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Beautiful spread in blues, greens, and pink. Purchased from Pottery Barn Pineapple print

Category

Home

Bedding

Comforters

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
~~$8.27~~ FREE Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on orders over $500!
FREE authentication on items over $500!

vcapobianco and 44 others like this

15 Comments

gardengirlnp What is the thread count please?

Sep 04Reply

billielatham91 Would you accept 425

Sep 12Reply

billielatham91 Sent you a offer.

Sep 13Reply

billielatham91 Please accept my offer.

Sep 13Reply

mjartino @gardengirlnp Hi. The thread count is not listed on the items, however,a Google search shows that it could be 200 count. Seems low for such an expensive item. obviously you would want to have it dry cleaned. Thank you for your interest.

Sep 13Reply

billielatham91 I am Withdrawing my offer. I see it is a bedspread not quit. Quilts I can have asked regular. Not so fun washing spreads. Thanks you so much

Sep 13Reply

billielatham91 Not purchasing. I thought it was a quilt set.

Sep 13Reply

mjartino @gardengirlnp I am to unable to confirm, but knowing that Lily Pulitzer fashions are always first quality, I would guess that the thread count would be high.

Sep 16Reply

pdebuhr @mjartino

Nov 07Reply

stacey1225 @mjartino Is it still available for purchase? Thanks 😊

Dec 22Reply

mjartino @stacey1225 Yes

Dec 22Reply

mjartino @stacey1225 yes

Dec 23Reply

ktrosch Is your price negotiable? I see it on the website for $179.

Jan 06Reply

billielatham91 @mjartino oohbbb. So low. Walmart basic bedding is higher. That’s really strange Can’t imagine anyone wanting it. It would not hold Up in a wash cycle. So sad. Is it a knock offf. Something isn’t right -

Apr 02Reply

billielatham91 @mjartino I agree. It must be a knock off

Apr 02Reply