tambrem

Updated May 05

Lariat in Army Rag & Bone Pants with Zip Pockets

Name: Lariat in Army Rag & Bone Pants with Zip Pockets
Brand: rag & bone
SKU: 5ea7a11809d760228078d650
Price: 55.0 USD
Availability: InStock

rag & bone

$55 $253

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $13.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Very attractive fitted through legs and cropped at ankle. Working zip accent pockets, button/zip fly and belt loops. Made in the USA

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 15% off 2+ Bundle
$8.27 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

thespikeheels and 10 others like this

10 Comments

erickaa hi are these cotton or more of a jegging material? also what is the inseam length? thanks

Apr 28Reply

tambrem @erickaa hello! They are 60% cotton, 35% modal, 5% polyurethane. I would say they fit much more like a pair of jeans then leggings. 30.5” inseam! Let me know if you have any other questions!

Apr 28Reply

chr1stymae Can you tell me the waist measurement? Typically rag and bone actual waist measurement is different than the tag. Thanks.

Sep 15Reply

tambrem @chr1stymae hello! Sorry for the late response. The wait measured from button to button is 29 1/2 inches from button to button hole

Sep 29Reply

chr1stymae @tambrem waist measurements are taken from side seam to side seam laying flat. So it should be like 14 or 15 or 16” something like that.

Sep 29Reply

tambrem @chr1stymae it’s just slightly over 14” laying flat. There is also a mild stretch to the fabric

Sep 29Reply

chr1stymae @tambrem okay thanks! Will be too small for me :/

Sep 29Reply

tambrem @chr1stymae sorry girl!

Sep 29Reply

staubsaugen @tambrem I saw the comments above, would you say they fit to size then?

Jan 30Reply

tambrem @staubsaugen hello! They measure 14” side seam to side seam which is the standard true to size for a size 26 to 27 pant falling right in the middle. I’m unfortunately not that size anymore lol but they fit me like a standard 26 when purchased! Hope that helps

Jul 17Reply