fashionoam

Updated Apr 19

Gucci Union Jack Leather High Top Sneakers

Name: Gucci Union Jack Leather High Top Sneakers
Brand: Gucci
SKU: 5ec09ad1446e59c1227888d4
Price: 995.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Gucci

$995 $995

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $248.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

New with box and dust bags G9.5=US10 and will also fit US10.5 as a tighter fit. Gucci Union Jack leather high top sneakers with metal angry cat head at tongues. Gorgeous and eye catching work of art.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

~~$7.97~~ FREE Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on orders over $500!
FREE authentication on items over $500!

aabrassaxx and 33 others like this

9 Comments

richmondawuah Please can you give me at 500

Jul 08Reply

fashionoam @richmondawuah Sorry i can’t. I’ll be losing money.

Jul 08Reply

richmondawuah @fashionoam how about 550

Jul 08Reply

fashionoam @richmondawuah I’m sorry. My break even is 600 due to posh commission.

Jul 08Reply

suriosa Hi there, I am super interested for my partner but because Gucci sizes are a lil wonky I want to compare these to a pair of his shoes that I know fit - can you provide the measurement of the length of the inside sole from heel to toe? Thank you!

Jan 01Reply

fashionoam @suriosa of course! I took out the inside sole and it measured as 11”. These should fit as relaxed US10 or normal fit US10.5 Men.

Jan 02Reply

fashionoam @suriosa I am currently not taking any offers under ask on them but if you hit the like I will send an offer in the future when they go on sale. I also have many other Gucci’s in my closet in different price points. Some flexible on pricing some not. Thank you for your interest :)

Jan 02Reply

suriosa thank you! they're in my likes and i'd def appreciate being notified if they go on sale, still considering them at full price but need to measure the other shoes without being caught first lol

Jan 02Reply

fashionoam @suriosa You’re welcome! And of course will notify you of any sales. Lol on sneaking.

Jan 02Reply