925 VINTAGE CHANTILLY or possible STRASBOURG GORHAM SILVER SPOON BRACELET

Name: 925 VINTAGE CHANTILLY or possible STRASBOURG GORHAM SILVER SPOON BRACELET
Brand: Gorham
SKU: 655531081741bebc1ae2a676
Price: 85.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Gorham

$85 $150

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $21.25 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

925 Vintage Chantilly or a Strasbourg Pattern by Gorham Sterling Silver Cuff Bangle Bracelet 2" x 2.25" Discover the charm of a Gorham Silver spoon bracelet – a vintage masterpiece with intricate details that showcases a vintage pattern that blends elegance, nostalgia and a touch of history to modern style. A distinctive accessory that stands out. Please note, I have not confirmed the definite pattern, Chantilly or Strasbourg. I am in the process of doing some research and will update as soon as I can say for sure. I'm the meantime, this bracelet is a collectors item from the iconic silver company Gorham and will be sure to be a prized find either way. gift, old fashioned, classic, traditional, holiday, Valentine's Day, girl, heirloom, collectors jewelry

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 3+ Bundle
$8.27 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

raquelavasquez and 14 others like this

4 Comments

christywm17 This pattern isn’t Strasbourg, which carries a shell motif at the tip. I think this is Chantilly instead. The two are very similar and often confused.

Nov 11Reply

925karma @christywm17 thank you for pointing that out. I will relook into it and do more research. I did have a difficult time because this did look like other designs. I want to be accurate, so I appreciate the help!

Nov 12Reply

christywm17 @925karma Hope it’s helpful. I stay on the lookout for Strasbourg and someone else is probably out there looking for Chantilly. 🙂 I’d hate for them to miss it if it doesn’t come up in a search!

Nov 12Reply

925karma @christywm17 You are right! I'm going to change it, maybe I'll mention both so it will get set both ways...

Nov 13Reply